Below (scan down a bit) is a piece I’ve just written at the invitation of Paul Bradshaw from the utterly wonder Online Journalism Blog. It accompanies another piece which he’ll put up shortly and shall link to here. He e-mailed me to say:
“I’m creating a 6-part series of responses to the government as part of its inquiry into the future of local and regional media. I will be submitting the whole – along with blog comments – to the Culture, Media and Sport Committee. They invited responses on 6 areas. This part will look at the 3rd:
The appropriateness and effectiveness of print and electronic publishing initiatives undertaken directly by public sector bodies at the local level.
That is really a long-winded way of saying “Should councils publish newspapers and put job ads online?”. The question of what public sector bodies should be allowed to publish, how that affects local journalism, and how it affects local democracy, is one of the most difficult to resolve – not least because it involves so many interconnected elements.”
So that’s what Paul asked and here are my thoughts – mostly on the question of the quality and transparency of information paid for from the public purse:
————————————————————-
I talk to a lot of people who work in council communications departments. They’re all conscious that the regional press is in trouble. If they’ve not recently lost a local paper they’ve certainly seen local journalists lose their jobs.
They consistently tell me one thing: “Because there are fewer reporters it’s easier to get coverage. These one who are left are really grateful for the stuff we give them. More and more they run it verbatim”.
On the one hand we have newspaper editors complaining about direct competition from council newspapers and websites, on the other they intensify their reliance on content from these same sources. This tension amply illustrates the waning value of newspapers as mediators.
Public bodies will continue to want to connect directly with an audience. They will find it ever easier to tell their stories in audio video, text and images and they will attach all that content to rss feeds for the benefit of individuals and publishers of all sizes.
Not only that but public services have a growing responsibility to talk directly to the public. The conversational web and data mashing offer an unprecedented opportunity to collaborate with us to improve public services. It would be negligent for any media regulation to stifle this. Indeed central government already actively encourages local councils to improve their direct relationship with the communities they serve.
Don’t be a King Cnut
Any minister making decisions now risks being derided in years to come for not understanding quite how powerful these new flows of information are, first to undermine the business model of newspaper and second to strengthen the democratic opportunities for our public services. I can’t imagine any sensible intervention from Andy Burnham of Hazel Blears demanding that this trend should be somehow stopped!
New standards for Public Information
Newspaper editors should stop bleating about potential competition. Instead they should fight for new standards for public information.
Clearly all public communications departments take care to be accurate and negotiate the line between politics and public service. Often they will check their facts more carefully than journalists might because they get more stick for being wrong.
But as more and more material stuff from local government press is used use un-mediated by millions of people how do we guarantee the quality of this information?
So now is not the time for government to stifle council communications teams. Now is the time to ask if we have the right editorial guidelines for council press officers and communications departments. Let us instead ensure every single one is a centre of excellence for plentiful, high quality and easily re-usable public information.
We already have at least one model for using public money to pay public servants to create content for the public good. It’s called the BBC. This is based on the rather clumsy notion of impartiality. The new model should be built on guarantee of quality that comes with transparency.
Any comments you make below will be posted, by Paul, through to the enquiry. Others in the series include:
Alex Lockwood on “The impact of newspaper closures on independent local journalism and access to local information”
Adrian Monck on “The opportunities and implications of BBC partnerships with Local Media“
